Laws Restricting the Paparazzi Essay -- Celebrity Photographer Media T

The paparazzi - a fusion of the Italian words papatacci, meaning gnat and razzi meaning the popping of flashbulbs. It is also known as predatory photography. The word paparazzo was coined by Federico Fellini, the name he gave to a prying society cameraman in his 1959 film La Dolce Vita. Paparazzi photographers argon fueled by large sums of money offered by the tabloid press. They try to catch the rich and famous in unflattering situations.The new breed of journalism grew by leaps and edge after the Watergate s fueldal first broke in Washington, DC (Petersens, 57). At first the paparazzi were an annoying group of photographers who were persistent when trying to get the perfect scissure of a celebrity so they could sell the image for large sums of money but as technology became more advanced so did the equipment the paparazzi used - telephoto lenses, hi-tech listening devices, and powerful zoom lenses on exposure cameras. No major celebrity can avoid them. Emerging from cars, entering glittering parties or trying to take a secluded vacation, the glamour figures of the 90s are hounded mercilessly by the men-and a few women-who wield long lenses and a brazen shamelessness (Maclean, 38). Today, paparazzis tread on private property, film celebrities during intimate moments, and even go as far as stalking a public figure. Some of these photos can be worth in the millions of dollars. A single photograph of Prince Charles seen together with his mistress Camilla Parker-Bowles is estimated to be worth 5 million English pounds. The prince says he would dearest to figure out a way for the proceeds to go to charity (Newsweek, 95).The prince and his mistress usu altogethery arrive and depart at different times in order to avoid the paparazzi when they attend a function together.The prince has been lucky. Almost all well known faces have had run-ins with the paparazzi but many have horror stories to tell. The check Actors Guild has been concerned with the paparazzi and how it affects many of its 100,000 members. The death of princess Diana was the final straw according to the SAG president, Richard Masur. He, along with California Senators Diane Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, and three respected constitutional scholars had a confluence to discuss what could be done about the paparazzi. In less than four hours, they came up with the rough wording of S. 2103 (Quill, 27).Before... ...g with the intent to capture audio or video images of a celebrity or law-breaking victim engaging in a personal or family activity. It will allow the celebrity or crime victim to recover damages from the paparazzi and people who employ them (Victorville). According to Andrea Brown, a spokesperson for former governor Pete Wilson, The governor thought it was important because of safety issues for practice everyday people. These people deserve to conduct their personal lives in private. Technology requires changes in any law. It creates new ways for people to commit crim es. After all the research done on the pros and cons of new laws that would affect the paparazzi its easy to see how these laws could affect people on both sides of the issue. Paparazzi photographers have to make a sustainment and the famous deserve their privacy. Celebrities know that with fame comes the loss of privacy but they do not deserve to loss all privacy and not all paparazzi photographers are ruthless, shameless, aggressive people. The laws that came into effect on January 1st, 1999 were only to restrain the most aggressive of photographers. We can only hope that the paparazzi will learn when theyve gone too far.